Tag changes in lintian 2.5.0~rc2 backport
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I uploaded lintian 2.5.0~rc2 to squeeze-backports yesterday (it is still
in their NEW queue at the moment). As promised on IRC here are the list
of auto-reject tags that has changed names (and semantics) since 2.4.3:
Fatal:
* package-installs-python-pyc => package-installs-python-bytecode
- Check is extended to all .pyo and .pyc files in the package.
- Previously it only checked for .pyc in parts of the package.
Non-fatal:
* embedded-zlib => embedded-library
- Check is extended to include embedded versions of all libraries
we currently check for (and will check for in the future).
- This includes all libraries that previously had its own
embedded-$lib tag.
Based on the stats from lintian.d.o[1], about 21 packages will need to
update their override and about 12 packages will need to add overrides
or dynamic link to the embedded library.
~Niels
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags-severity.html
Copy pasted here:
[...]
# embedded-libjpeg (2 packages, 4 tags, plus 6 overrides)
# embedded-libopenjpeg (0 packages, 0 tags, plus 1 overrides)
# embedded-libpng (0 packages, 0 tags, plus 2 overrides)
# embedded-library (10 packages, 17 tags, plus 6 overrides)
# embedded-zlib (0 packages, 0 tags, plus 12 overrides)
[...]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Z1vZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: