Re: [SCM] Debian package checker branch, infra-513663, updated. 2.5.0-rc1-129-g6c9fa88
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-03 10:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the infra-513663 branch:
> commit 6c9fa88d5318b379110469f9f850d608bc98f3bf
> Author: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
> Date: Sun Apr 3 10:04:33 2011 +0200
>
> Added cross-pkg broken symlink check (for absolute symlinks only)
>
> [...]
> diff --git a/t/tests/symlinks-broken/tags b/t/tests/symlinks-broken/tags
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a04e8b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/tests/symlinks-broken/tags
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +W: broken-links: package-contains-broken-symlink usr/lib/broken-links/some.conf /etc/some.conf
>
Come to think of it; what is the "correct" way of reporting an absolute
symlink? With or without the leading slash?
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=zv2z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: