-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-01-08 12:11, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2011-01-06 19:37, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Russ Allbery wrote: >>> While I agree with this message that idiomatic English would call for >>> different phrasing in a lot of places, I think correcting "allows to" to >>> "allows one to" would be acceptable, if not ideal, phrasing in every >>> example given there. > > >> This one was on my ToDo list and had the following temp commit: >> +(?i)allows to||allows _object_ to >> +(?i)requires to||requires _object_ to >> +(?i)helps to||helps _object_ to >> +(?i)permits to||permits _object_ to > >> [...] Hi again, I have created a second patch, including all of Raphael's other catches using the "$VERB one to" notation. I will apply it to the master branch in a couple of days, unless someone feels strongly about it. ~Niels -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNMBO5AAoJEAVLu599gGRCLagP/im/mGj1gek5ryltrxjaOmbk b1uuw4xvonwc8uuXK+00l/Q6OfasuAsJiV6ZEvD3VXMrodKP1i5MWDrrG9ObEz4W dW2fp9bwfAYPMw9ONSt5TYMPr/V6ZGwvcZw85qXbkZjphpN3btSvkILoeSGd3BLl UO/ZcgHXMtjDvOwYmPtihTowEpKSW+fA1dtO3xKf5zbNhN63DW6doU94g+t9gOET KSl9RBIr71xMxOo9FS0MV60t3zNgT4+GfaPtWJpscM0tBzPo4VuePsLspHXLjxB6 iqIv+0KtAdz/5UEjTkm2pMm4jJOEpLpXRgmGppjOHZSF676AjMb2+m+0TCaguEkB LOu/iLPOaZdK7yx7D/Gb8H495IeyzQ0g11JUtQv3+gKp2pA981pC/6yip9540Rxt Z1tbOwYYgO8Xh32jKWXotBnSmFdmLvkGTe6Mr63zKAIMDJRHW00lAYg5zn5yEYnt tow6p219n5y9F+laJb1I3wxsNQ6VrCPZPg9dBcAkh9HdwP7203CyOAWIKHzf9CHV 9Gjk6Q8rHnEva6KhpVn0iiLddaxxdPO3ht8o9Ee55eiaA2VCYaxruT3YMODN3Wv9 UdqeNZykQWdICDZHDSS3dqMXSTrJsEbTurJKunoKD+9nH7C3VFYkC8JgvK3euXoa jl5mX/1TODghUYtY1nAX =P2f7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From 5ae1cd01b71641c252eb40225f7c347309573e36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:29:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Catch "allows to" as a spelling error. LP: 608231 --- data/spelling/corrections-multiword | 5 +++++ .../spelling-multiword/debian/debian/control.in | 6 +++++- t/tests/spelling-multiword/tags | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/data/spelling/corrections-multiword b/data/spelling/corrections-multiword index 71a066e..6a706d3 100644 --- a/data/spelling/corrections-multiword +++ b/data/spelling/corrections-multiword @@ -5,7 +5,12 @@ # The format of each line is: # SPELLING_MISTAKE_REGEX||correction +(?i)allows to||allows one to (?i)an other||another (?i)debian/gnu linux||Debian GNU/Linux +(?i)helps to||helps one to +(?i)permits to||permits one to +(?i)requires to||requires one to (?i)these package||this package (?i)this packages||these packages + diff --git a/t/tests/spelling-multiword/debian/debian/control.in b/t/tests/spelling-multiword/debian/debian/control.in index fa441cc..a5b7830 100644 --- a/t/tests/spelling-multiword/debian/debian/control.in +++ b/t/tests/spelling-multiword/debian/debian/control.in @@ -15,8 +15,12 @@ Description: {$description} be an empty package. . Spelling errors: - * Debian/GNU Linux + * Allows to * An other error + * Debian/GNU Linux + * Helps to + * Permits to + * Requires to * This packages . Not errors: diff --git a/t/tests/spelling-multiword/tags b/t/tests/spelling-multiword/tags index a954125..4a5e916 100644 --- a/t/tests/spelling-multiword/tags +++ b/t/tests/spelling-multiword/tags @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description Allows to Allows one to W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description An other Another W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description Debian/GNU Linux Debian GNU/Linux +W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description Helps to Helps one to +W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description Permits to Permits one to +W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description Requires to Requires one to W: spelling-multiword: spelling-error-in-description This packages These packages -- 1.7.2.3
Attachment:
0001-Catch-allows-to-as-a-spelling-error.-LP-608231.patch.sig
Description: Binary data