[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.4.2-30-gb7fb16c



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit b7fb16c2340c2f6b39041ab66c1db2a9456f08af
Author: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date:   Sun Jul 25 18:07:42 2010 -0700

    Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order description
    
    * checks/rules.desc:
      + [RA] Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order long
        description to try to be clearer about the ordering requirements.
        (Closes: #579964)

diff --git a/checks/rules.desc b/checks/rules.desc
index ab38d94..7dd263f 100644
--- a/checks/rules.desc
+++ b/checks/rules.desc
@@ -104,10 +104,11 @@ Severity: normal
 Certainty: certain
 Info: One of the targets in the <tt>debian/rules</tt> file for this
  package calls debhelper programs in an odd order.  Normally,
- dh_makeshlibs should be called before dh_shlibdeps or dh_installdeb,
- dh_shlibdeps should be called before dh_gencontrol, and all should be
- called before dh_builddeb.  Calling them in the wrong order may cause
- incorrect or missing package files and metadata.
+ dh_makeshlibs should be run before dh_shlibdeps or dh_installdeb, and
+ dh_shlibdeps should be run before dh_gencontrol.  dh_builddeb should be
+ the last debhelper action when building the package, after any of the
+ other programs mentioned.  Calling these programs in the wrong order may
+ cause incorrect or missing package files and metadata.
 
 Tag: missing-build-dependency
 Severity: serious
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d988d66..130c983 100755
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ lintian (2.4.3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
       tag.  Thanks, Robert Luberda.  (Closes: #585657)
   * checks/po-debconf:
     + [RA] Ignore comments in po/POTFILES.in.  (Closes: #586036)
+  * checks/rules.desc:
+    + [RA] Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order long
+      description to try to be clearer about the ordering requirements.
+      (Closes: #579964)
   * checks/scripts.desc:
     + [RA] Improve python-script-but-no-python-dep tag description to be
       clearer about the requirement for a versioned dependency for

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: