[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.4.2-30-gb7fb16c
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit b7fb16c2340c2f6b39041ab66c1db2a9456f08af
Author: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Sun Jul 25 18:07:42 2010 -0700
Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order description
* checks/rules.desc:
+ [RA] Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order long
description to try to be clearer about the ordering requirements.
(Closes: #579964)
diff --git a/checks/rules.desc b/checks/rules.desc
index ab38d94..7dd263f 100644
--- a/checks/rules.desc
+++ b/checks/rules.desc
@@ -104,10 +104,11 @@ Severity: normal
Certainty: certain
Info: One of the targets in the <tt>debian/rules</tt> file for this
package calls debhelper programs in an odd order. Normally,
- dh_makeshlibs should be called before dh_shlibdeps or dh_installdeb,
- dh_shlibdeps should be called before dh_gencontrol, and all should be
- called before dh_builddeb. Calling them in the wrong order may cause
- incorrect or missing package files and metadata.
+ dh_makeshlibs should be run before dh_shlibdeps or dh_installdeb, and
+ dh_shlibdeps should be run before dh_gencontrol. dh_builddeb should be
+ the last debhelper action when building the package, after any of the
+ other programs mentioned. Calling these programs in the wrong order may
+ cause incorrect or missing package files and metadata.
Tag: missing-build-dependency
Severity: serious
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d988d66..130c983 100755
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ lintian (2.4.3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
tag. Thanks, Robert Luberda. (Closes: #585657)
* checks/po-debconf:
+ [RA] Ignore comments in po/POTFILES.in. (Closes: #586036)
+ * checks/rules.desc:
+ + [RA] Rephrase the debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order long
+ description to try to be clearer about the ordering requirements.
+ (Closes: #579964)
* checks/scripts.desc:
+ [RA] Improve python-script-but-no-python-dep tag description to be
clearer about the requirement for a versioned dependency for
--
Debian package checker
Reply to: