Re: lintian_2.3.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Raphael Geissert <geissert@debian.org> writes:
> Ok, perfect.
> Just one question: should I treat the "may not" of the newly added
> triplet exception as a severity: important, certainty: possible? or why
> was it phrased as "may not" instead of "must not?"
I think that was supposed to be must not. I'd treat it as severity:
serious, certainty: possible. I'll raise that with the Policy list.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: