Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description

To: 548640@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
From: Paul Gevers <paul@climbing.nl>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:04:30 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4AC0DE8E.4010704@climbing.nl>
Reply-to: Paul Gevers <paul@climbing.nl>, 548640@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87d45cnh2o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
References: <[🔎] 4ABFC76E.2090800@climbing.nl> <[🔎] 87d45cnh2o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>

> I assume from that that dpatch supports DEP-3 and doesn't get confused by
> comments not using that prefix?

The patches apply cleanly. So I assume, yes. Header is maintained by
dpatch-edit-patch when the @DPATCH@ tag is found (according to it's own
comments).

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
  - From: Paul Gevers <paul@climbing.nl>
- Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
Next by Date: lintian 2.2.17 MIGRATED to testing
Previous by thread: Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
Next by thread: Bug#548640: lintian check for dpatch describtion could honnor DEP3 style description
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread