Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> writes: > I don't know why I had the idea that it returned the return code of the > process. But taking a look at it again, I think we want && here, so that > 1 is returned only if none of the processes had to be SIGKILLed. Good point. Fixed. -- Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>