On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 19:34 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > In this particular case, I think the best path forward would be to form a > Flash packaging group that takes as their mission packaging the common > code -- in other words, being proactive at developing the solution instead > of trying to push other packagers into doing the work. There is a pkg-flash and a debian-flash list, but neither are really used at all. I don't maintain any web software that duplicates flash bits, so I'm not really motivated to package stuff that I don't use. I guess this bug should be closed then, I doubt there will be a time when anyone is motivated to package flash stuff properly without lintian naggery. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part