[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: setting package to lintian, tagging 513336, tagging 513650



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
> # via tagpending
> #
> # lintian (2.2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> #  * checks/fields{,.desc}:
> #    + [RA] Run dbg-package-missing-depends against the source package
> #      instead of the binary package and check that it has a dependency
> #      against another binary package built from the same source rather
> #      than making assumptions about the package name.  Patch from Raphael
> #      Geissert.  (Closes: #513336)
> #    + [RA] Use binary_field() to read control fields for binary packages.
> #      Patch from Raphael Geissert.
> #  * checks/files{,.desc}:
> #    + [RA] Add check for fonts in non-font packages.  Thanks, Paul Wise
> #      and Raphael Geissert.  (Closes: #513650)
> #    + [RA] Add check for fonts that duplicate already packaged fonts.
> #      Patch from Raphael Geissert.  Thanks to Paul Wise for analysis and
> #      data.  (Partly addresses #298545)
> #
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian

> tags 513336 + pending
Bug#513336: lintian: dbg-package-missing-depends should work on the source package
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 513650 + pending
Bug#513650: lintian: pedantic: check for fonts in non-font package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


Reply to: