[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.3.0-44-gcfb5bee
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit cfb5bee3d139467aeca9d9b17f9ed11b1a675da2
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Dec 30 23:07:50 2009 -0600
Correct the grammar of some tag descriptions
* checks/init.d.desc:
+ [RG] Correct the description of the
missing-dependency-on-{remote,local_fs} tags where 'is' was meant
to be used instead of 'are'.
diff --git a/checks/init.d.desc b/checks/init.d.desc
index da190a2..a4b494b 100644
--- a/checks/init.d.desc
+++ b/checks/init.d.desc
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ Info: The given init script seems to refer to <tt>/usr</tt>, possibly
it's unmounted.
.
Using Should-Start or Should-Stop to declare the dependency is
- conceptually incorrect since the $remote_fs facility are always
+ conceptually incorrect since the $remote_fs facility is always
available. Required-Start or Required-Stop should be used instead.
Ref: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
@@ -328,6 +328,6 @@ Info: The given init script seems to refer to <tt>/var</tt>, possibly
run before <tt>/var</tt> is mounted or after it's unmounted.
.
Using Should-Start or Should-Stop to declare the dependency is
- conceptually incorrect since the $local_fs facility are always
+ conceptually incorrect since the $local_fs facility is always
available. Required-Start or Required-Stop should be used instead.
Ref: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 3c2b971..5f516ad 100755
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ lintian (2.3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ [RG] Also recognise the use of the -r test as a file test when
determining whether a /etc/default file is being sourced
unconditionally.
+ + [RG] Correct the description of the
+ missing-dependency-on-{remote,local_fs} tags where 'is' was meant
+ to be used instead of 'are'.
* checks/manpages.desc:
+ [RA] Downgrade spelling-error-in-manpage to minor severity.
(Closes: #563039)
--
Debian package checker
Reply to: