[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562608: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop not for just 1.)



Your message dated Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:26:54 +0100
with message-id <20091226172654.GA8864@roeckx.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#562608: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop not for just 1.
has caused the Debian Bug report #562608,
regarding lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop not for just 1.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
562608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562608
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.18

Hi,

I'm seeing an init.d-script-possible-missing-stop because I only
have 1, and so not 0 and 6 in the Default-Stop of my init script.

I believe this to be correct.  As far as I know sendsigs is not
called when going to runlevel 1, only for 0 and 6.


Kurt




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:56:51AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> 
> killprocs is the script that serves the same pourposes as sendsigs in rc1.
> 
> The tag description could be improved to mention killprocs and not just
> sendsigs.

Right, so feel free to close this bug, or look at it as a wishlist
bug requesting the description to be improved.


Kurt



--- End Message ---

Reply to: