gregor herrmann wrote: >> Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com> writes: >>> Here's the explanation for why: >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/2009-October/026578.html >> Before I do this, can I get confirmation that this is still the intention? >> This was several months ago and I'm not sure if the plans have changed >> since. There isn't any indication in the long description of perl-modules >> that the package is going away or that other packages shouldn't depend on >> it. > > Let's put the perl maintainers in the loop (cc). > This was my intention, but due to real life and laziness the needed changes are not uploaded. They are mostly ready, but some corner cases need to be dealt. Let me return to this bug report in a week. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature