[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.18-45-g683558b



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 683558b4eebb9467dc20b6810ecc845e89d4d91c
Author: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date:   Thu Dec 24 13:50:19 2009 -0800

    Adjust legacy test suite for additional debhelper ${misc:Depends}

diff --git a/testset/tags.debug b/testset/tags.debug
index af7e259..62d9873 100644
--- a/testset/tags.debug
+++ b/testset/tags.debug
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ W: debug source: ancient-standards-version 3.7.0 (current is 3.8.3)
 W: debug source: changelog-should-not-mention-nmu
 W: debug source: dbg-package-missing-depends hi-dbg
 W: debug source: dbg-package-missing-depends libhello0-dbg
+W: debug source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends hello-hello-dbg
+W: debug source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends hi-dbg
 W: debug source: debhelper-script-needs-versioned-build-depends dh_icons (>= 5.0.51~)
 W: debug source: debian-rules-sets-DH_COMPAT line 5
 W: debug source: timewarp-standards-version (2006-04-04 < 2006-04-26)
diff --git a/testset/tags.libbaz b/testset/tags.libbaz
index d0e9aa0..8a1d442 100644
--- a/testset/tags.libbaz
+++ b/testset/tags.libbaz
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ N: 4 tags overridden (4 warnings)
 W: ia32-libbaz2: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
 W: libbaz source: ancient-standards-version 3.2.1 (current is 3.8.3)
 W: libbaz source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends ia32-libbaz2
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbaz1
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbaz1-dev
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbaz2
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbaz2-dbg
+W: libbaz source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libbaz2-dev
 W: libbaz source: native-package-with-dash-version
 W: libbaz source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 6
 W: libbaz source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1-1

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: