[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.2.12-22-g0eb57be



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 0eb57be92edb1f89906ff3033dd40ba861e0fe26
Author: Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date:   Mon Jun 29 21:50:47 2009 +0100

    Update testsuite output for recent changes

diff --git a/testset/tags.debconf b/testset/tags.debconf
index 3002cc3..e467b03 100644
--- a/testset/tags.debconf
+++ b/testset/tags.debconf
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ I: debconf-test: unused-debconf-template debconf/translate
 W: debconf source: debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order dh_makeshlibs (line 49)
 W: debconf source: debian-rules-calls-debhelper-in-odd-order dh_makeshlibs (line 53)
 W: debconf source: debian-rules-sets-DH_COMPAT line 3
-W: debconf source: dpatch-build-dep-but-no-patch-list debconf
+W: debconf source: dpatch-build-dep-but-no-patch-list
 W: debconf source: invalid-po-file debian/po/fr.po
 W: debconf source: invalid-po-file debian/po/sample-file.po
 W: debconf source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/debconf-test.postinst
diff --git a/testset/tags.relations b/testset/tags.relations
index 83bd998..992e555 100644
--- a/testset/tags.relations
+++ b/testset/tags.relations
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ W: relations source: package-depends-on-itself relations depends
 W: relations source: package-depends-on-itself relations-multiple-libs recommends
 W: relations source: package-has-a-duplicate-build-relation foo (= 3) [!amd64 !i386], foo (<< 4) [!amd64 !i386]
 W: relations source: package-has-a-duplicate-build-relation perl, perl (>= 5.0)
-W: relations source: quilt-build-dep-but-no-series-file relations
+W: relations source: quilt-build-dep-but-no-series-file
 W: relations source: redundant-origin-field
 W: relations source: stronger-dependency-implies-weaker relations depends -> recommends dpkg
 W: relations source: stronger-dependency-implies-weaker relations depends -> recommends null

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: