-=| Damyan Ivanov, Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:02:31AM +0300 |=- > Here's a patch implementing this. Being bitten by the missing coomma > problem was stimulating :) > > The new check detects cases like > > Depends: foo, bar > baz > > and gives false positives for > > Depends: foo, bar, baz > (>= 2) > > and > > Depends: foo, bar, baz (>= > 2) > > Given that the later two cases are not very likely to happen with > people that carry about easy reading of lists as to wrap them, I think > the check is good enough. Improved patch catches the later two cases and doesn't report them. Because of this I've changed the Certainty field to 'certain'. Happy hacking! -- dam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature