Bug#522643: lintian: Typo in "out-of-date-standards-version" description
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.9
Severity: minor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There is a small typo in "out-of-date-standards-version" tag description.
verison->version
You canf find attached, a diff shows what files are concerned.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknYx64ACgkQ35KHK503hANcqACcC59bpovSGc8yk0ml/VfbvIlz
keAAmwdEFbQ8ixKD6A5VXsEFeA3PD7mh
=j4eG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff -urN lintian.orig/checks/standards-version.desc lintian/checks/standards-version.desc
--- lintian.orig/checks/standards-version.desc 2009-03-12 06:14:52.000000000 +0100
+++ lintian/checks/standards-version.desc 2009-04-04 20:11:17.000000000 +0200
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
you upload the package.
.
See <tt>/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz</tt> in
- the debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer verisons of
+ the debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of
Policy.
Tag: out-of-date-standards-version
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
you upload the package.
.
See <tt>/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz</tt> in
- the debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer verisons of
+ the debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of
Policy.
Tag: timewarp-standards-version
diff -urN lintian.orig/lib/Lintian/Relation.pm lintian/lib/Lintian/Relation.pm
--- lintian.orig/lib/Lintian/Relation.pm 2009-03-12 06:14:52.000000000 +0100
+++ lintian/lib/Lintian/Relation.pm 2009-04-04 20:13:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
| # or
\$\{[a-zA-Z0-9:-]+\} # substvar
) # end of package name or substvar
- (?: # start of optional verison
+ (?: # start of optional version
\s* \( # open parenthesis for version part
\s* (<<|<=|=|>=|>>|<|>) # relation part (2)
\s* (.*?) # version (3)
Reply to: