--- On Sun, 2/1/09, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#507849: lintian.d.o run finished, source/binary mismatch not quite fixed
To: 507849@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 1:43 PM
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
>> I'm going to try regenerating the package list by hand and see if
I come
>> up with any different results.
> Running list-binpkg by hand returns the correct listing and source
> value. I wonder if I didn't clean the laboratory as thoroughly as I
> thought I had. After I upload the next release, I'll do another full
> archive run to test both this and the memory leak fix.
I unfortunately can now confirm that this is still broken. I checked the
binary-packages listing and it had the right value for the source version,
but after a full run (with harness -f), the value in the binary-packages
list is wrong again.
gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/info> grep
aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486 binary-packages
aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486;2.6.26+0+20080719-6;linux-modules-extra-2.6;2.6.26+0+20080719-6;pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486_2.6.26+0+20080719-6_i386.deb;1229775426
This claims the binary package with version 2.6.26+0+20080719-6 was built
from a source package with the same version. However, this is clearly
wrong:
gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/binary/aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486>
dpkg -I deb | grep Source
Source: linux-modules-extra-2.6 (2.6.26-6)
I don't understand what's failing in the code and I've looked at it
a
couple of times now. I think it needs more eyeballs.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
|