Re: On dropping 'Type'
Jordà Polo <jorda@ettin.org> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 07:44:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Now that the EWI code is generated via %codes, why is Type still around
>> then?
> There is probably no reason to keep it, but it doesn't really hurt
> either. Some may still find it useful as a reference, and to easily
> compare to the new classification.
> Anyway, I don't really have a strong opinion about it. I'm fine if it is
> removed.
If we're using severity/certainty exclusively now, we should probably
remove it since it's going to drift out of sync and then just be confusing
and wrong. Always a good idea to delete untested code. :)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: