Re: usage of lintian as an automated and forced qa check tool
On 11469 March 1977, Jordà Polo wrote:
> Still, it would be interesting to know what kind of tags do you plan to
> autoreject on. Perhaps your set of tags can be directly mapped to a
> particular group of tags using Severity/Certainty. This way we could
> avoid duplication and synchronization (e.g. new tags, changes in current
> tags, fetching ftpmaster's tags file...). If it can't be easily mapped,
> some adjustments could still be made. And if it is really needed, this
> is not necessarily incompatible with a tags file. Just trying to
> reduce/avoid as much as possible duplicate info and synchronization.
The master file on which we will base our rejects will always live on
the ftpmaster host, as we
- want the full control over what gets rejected,
- want to change it without having a new lintian release.
The tags itself - i still have to go through all of the existing ones to
know all we want, currently i have some 9 or 10 only for sure.
--
bye, Joerg
[...] some would argue that too much free beer with hamper your ability to free
speech; this is an opinion.
Reply to: