Re: git migration
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> writes:
> I would propose to switch to the git repository soon so that we can
> change the VCS fields for the upcoming 1.24.2 upload.
Go for it. I'm definitely content with doing the switch.
> I would also like to start converting the checks/ scripts to use
> Lintian::Collect, but would prefer to do so in a branch. I want to avoid
> having to do that branching in both svn and git.
Excellent idea.
> So far I found one minor issue with the test suite that looks related to
> the switch:
> Running test on diffs 1-1~lint1: copying... building... testing... FAILED:
> --- testset/tags.diffs 2008-06-20 03:19:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ debian/tests/tags.diffs 2008-06-20 03:23:22.000000000 +0200
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> W: diffs source: diff-contains-substvars debian/substvars
> W: diffs source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff .#binary.c.1.34
> W: diffs source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff .bzr/dummy
> -W: diffs source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff .git/dummy
> W: diffs source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff binary.c~
> W: diffs: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/diffs
> W: diffs: possible-missing-colon-in-closes Closes #1239124
>
> Hadn't time to investigate, yet.
I can poke at it hopefully before long if you don't get a chance. Looks
minor to me, and I have a fairly good idea of what might be causing it.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: