[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r1275 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: rra
Date: 2008-04-22 00:00:37 +0200 (Tue, 22 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1275

Modified:
   trunk/checks/scripts
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
  + [RA] Expect unversioned dependencies on OCaml packages rather than
    versioned dependencies since the version changes frequently and
    unversioned dependencies are what people are already using.  Thanks,
    Hideki Yamane.  (Closes: #476417)

Modified: trunk/checks/scripts
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/scripts	2008-04-17 21:16:23 UTC (rev 1274)
+++ trunk/checks/scripts	2008-04-21 22:00:37 UTC (rev 1275)
@@ -70,9 +70,7 @@
      make	    => [ '/usr/bin', 'make | build-essential' ],
      mawk	    => [ '/usr/bin' ],
      ocamlrun	    => [ '/usr/bin',
-			 join (' | ', map { "$_-3.10.0" }
-			       qw/ocaml-base-nox ocaml-base ocaml-nox ocaml/)
-		       ],
+			 'ocaml-base-nox | ocaml-base | ocaml-nox | ocaml' ],
      pagsh	    => [ '/usr/bin', 'openafs-client | heimdal-clients' ],
      parrot	    => [ '/usr/bin' ],
      perl	    => [ '/usr/bin', '' ],

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2008-04-17 21:16:23 UTC (rev 1274)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2008-04-21 22:00:37 UTC (rev 1275)
@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@
       files do not need to be executable even if they look like scripts.
     + [RA] Add clisp, procmail, and rrdcgi, and another way interpretors
       are templated in *.in files.
+    + [RA] Expect unversioned dependencies on OCaml packages rather than
+      versioned dependencies since the version changes frequently and
+      unversioned dependencies are what people are already using.  Thanks,
+      Hideki Yamane.  (Closes: #476417)
   * checks/shared-libs:
     + [RA] Move the default ld.so search path into data.  Drop obsolete
       /usr/lib/libg++-dbg, /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d, and libc5 compatibility


Reply to: