[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#476565: lintian: please don't ignore Checksums-Sha{1, 256} but check them



* Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> [2008-04-19 14:08:20 CEST]:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:56:26PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >  It would be nice if the Sha1/Sha256 checksums could be checked instead
> > of being simply ignored.
> 
> Do you mean in .changes or in .dsc? Checks for .changes can probably
> easily added, since we already do some for the files field.

 That's fine with me, I usually run lintian on the .changes file indeed.
If the ones in the .dsc files weren't checked at all before I don't see
much of a regression with not adding a check for it, that would indeed
be a feature request then (which wasn't my intention) and not a (minor)
bug fix. :)

> For the .dsc dpkg-source will probably fail during the unpack phase
> anyway if the checksums field is broken somewhat.

 Hopefully it does not only check the md5sum, yes.

 Thanks,
Rhonda



Reply to: