[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#476417: [lintian] [check/scripts] ocamlrun => ocaml-*3.10.0



Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> writes:

> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.46
> Severity: normal
>
>  I've got Error from lintian as "missing-dep-for-interpreter ocamlrun => 
>  ocaml-base-nox-3.10.0 | ocaml-base-3.10.0 | ocaml-nox-3.10.0 | ocaml-3.10.0 
>  (./usr/lib/fsc/default/compiler/link)"
>
>  But is "-3.10.0" needed? packages are provided without "-3.10.0" in those
>  package names.

We were told by the OCaml maintainers, if I recall correctly, that the
version should be required in dependencies because OCaml changes enough
between versions that the generic names don't provide a tight enough
version restriction.  I personally don't know anything about OCaml, so I'm
happy to change lintian if that's not correct.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Reply to: