[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r1228 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-22 18:18:57 +0100 (Fri, 22 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1228

Modified:
   trunk/checks/common_data.pm
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/common_data.pm:
  + [RA] Accept (and ignore for now) the new Checksums-Sha1,
    Checksums-Sha256, and Checksums-Md5 fields in source packages.
    Thanks, Raphael Hertzog.  (Closes: #466979)

Modified: trunk/checks/common_data.pm
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/common_data.pm	2008-02-22 17:15:33 UTC (rev 1227)
+++ trunk/checks/common_data.pm	2008-02-22 17:18:57 UTC (rev 1228)
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@
      'build-conflicts', 'build-conflicts-indep', 'format', 'origin',
      'uploaders', 'python-version', 'autobuild', 'homepage', 'vcs-arch',
      'vcs-bzr', 'vcs-cvs', 'vcs-darcs', 'vcs-git', 'vcs-hg', 'vcs-mtn',
-     'vcs-svn', 'vcs-browser', 'dm-upload-allowed', 'bugs');
+     'vcs-svn', 'vcs-browser', 'dm-upload-allowed', 'bugs', 'checksums-sha1',
+     'checksums-sha256', 'checksums-md5');
 
 # The Ubuntu original-maintainer field is handled separately.
 %known_binary_fields = map { $_ => 1 }

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2008-02-22 17:15:33 UTC (rev 1227)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2008-02-22 17:18:57 UTC (rev 1228)
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
   * checks/changelog-file:
     + [RA] Adjust for the extra space added by Parse::DebianChangelog when
       checking line length.  Thanks, Robert Millan.  (Closes: #467019)
+  * checks/common_data.pm:
+    + [RA] Accept (and ignore for now) the new Checksums-Sha1,
+      Checksums-Sha256, and Checksums-Md5 fields in source packages.
+      Thanks, Raphael Hertzog.  (Closes: #466979)
   * checks/control-files{.desc,}:
     + [FL] Warn about empty control files. I can't see any use for
       them. Exclude udebs though, since they might differ there.


Reply to: