--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.28
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Based on #466423, I think it would be nice for lintian to warn about
packages using a debhelper compatibility other than whatever was latest
in the most recent stable release.
For example, take Etch, which had a debhelper compatibility level of 5
at the time of its release. If you built a package with debhelper
compat of 4, then that should cause a warning as it is using an outdated
compatibility level. Likewise, if it were to use compatibility level 6
(recently available), it should at the very least generate an info, or
preferrably a warning.
This is just an idea, so please feel free to change it, or even to close
the bug outright if you feel it is wrong.
Regards,
- -Roberto
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.17-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.43-2 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.25 package building tools for Debian
ii file 4.17-5etch3 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.16.1-1 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libparse-debianchangel 1.0-1 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii man-db 2.4.3-6 The on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-md5-pe 5.8.8-7etch1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHub+f5SXWIKfIlGQRAsrgAJwNfsYmyIxopggIZq5iainUNJPGOQCfZXKP
Ja/zStABEl+j4w0HlZr+6kc=
=J/+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> For the compatibility level 6 part, I personally agree (and it
>> certainly makes backporting easier), but I know some other maintainers
>> don't and use V6 as a matter of course, particularly for new packages.
>> I'm not sure that it's appropriate in this case for lintian to be used
>> as a way of trying to force consensus. Basically, I don't want to
>> irritate people with tags that they don't agree with and aren't ever
>> going to follow, since it makes fewer people use lintian at all.
> OK. That seems fair. Please feel free to close the report.
Closing per submitter.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---