Re: new set of changes

To: debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: new set of changes
From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:36:18 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] g6vopg$keo$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <g6r5f6$cip$1@ger.gmane.org> <1217546049.19468.36.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> <[🔎] g6tngd$jvv$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1217569123.19468.42.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>

Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> I'm still not sure the reference is needed. I suspect that as a
> maintainer presented with the tag I'd assume that uscan(1) contained
> information on why my watch file shouldn't contain the version number it
> does. Others' mileages may vary, of course.

Well, if that's the case then feel free to remove it :)

> 
> Adam
> 
> Adam

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Reply to:

References:
- Re: new set of changes
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: new set of changes
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#293296: lintian: detect outdated libtool for GNU/kFreeBSD
Next by Date: Fix and improve reference links (was: GSoC status: classification, output format and more)
Previous by thread: Re: new set of changes
Next by thread: Re: new set of changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread