Bug#364472: marked as done (lintian: [Feture request] *.deb is missing /usr/bin programs)
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:29:53 +0100
with message-id <1215019793.30733.2.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#364472: lintian: [Feture request] *.deb is missing /usr/bin programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #364472,
regarding lintian: [Feture request] *.deb is missing /usr/bin programs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
364472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: lintian: [Feture request] *.deb is missing /usr/bin programs
- From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:32:20 +0300
- Message-id: <20060423173220.30853.11339.reportbug@cante>
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.17
Severity: wishlist
When dh_make'ing a "single binary" package, the lintian does not seem to notice
if the package's Makefile does not install the binaries to /usr/bin hierarchy.
An exmaple, after checking the contant of generated *.deb:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:38 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:35 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:33 ./usr/bin/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:33 ./usr/sbin/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:35 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:35 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-04-23 20:23:37 ./usr/share/doc/miwm/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 2640 2003-06-23 17:47:23 ./usr/share/doc/miwm/notes.txt
-rw-r--r-- root/root 1058 2006-04-23 20:20:56 ./usr/share/doc/miwm/copyright
-rw-r--r-- root/root 187 2006-04-23 20:18:16 ./usr/share/doc/miwm/changelog.Debia
-
FEATURE REQUEST
If package is labelled binary and not library and it contains a
/usr/bin hierarhy, lintian could issue a warning that "/usr/bin is
empty"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.16.1cvs20060413-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.41-1 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.18 package building tools for Debian
ii file 4.17-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.14.5-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.34.2+20060415 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libparse-debianchang 1.0-1 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii man-db 2.4.3-3 The on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-md5- 5.8.8-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>, 364472-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#364472: lintian: [Feture request] *.deb is missing /usr/bin programs
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:29:53 +0100
- Message-id: <1215019793.30733.2.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
- In-reply-to: <20060423173220.30853.11339.reportbug@cante>
- References: <20060423173220.30853.11339.reportbug@cante>
Version: 1.23.37
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 20:32 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.17
> Severity: wishlist
>
> When dh_make'ing a "single binary" package, the lintian does not seem to notice
> if the package's Makefile does not install the binaries to /usr/bin hierarchy.
There is now a 'package-contains-empty-directory' check, which would
catch this.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: