Off-by-one in the tags report?

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

Hi,

I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.

Part of the report includes:

        derivations (binary)
        suggests: tetex-bin
        devscripts (binary)
        suggests: gs-gpl
        dfsbuild (binary)
        recommends: mailx
        
but, in fact, derivations suggests gs-gpl, whereas devscripts recommends
mailx.

On a closer look, it appears that the first package (abntex) is missing
and all the package names are then associated with the tags belonging to
the package before them in the list.

Adam