Re: lintian.d.o improvements
- To: Jordà Polo <jorda@ettin.org>
- Cc: debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: lintian.d.o improvements
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:33:30 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87lk1hc41h.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20080428201301.GA3682@moriah> ("Jordà Polo"'s message of "Mon\, 28 Apr 2008 22\:13\:01 +0200")
- References: <20080405210301.GA4069@moriah> <87wsnb874c.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20080406162434.GA28696@moriah> <87bq4mk035.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20080409082713.GA14932@moriah> <87y77n71nq.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20080412202733.GA27512@moriah> <8763umby22.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <20080427170258.GA27670@hinnom> <874p9n6p21.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20080428201301.GA3682@moriah>
Jordà Polo <jorda@ettin.org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Hm, yes, that's a problem. I think I slightly prefer [4] in that case,
>> but another possible change to [3] would be to just add the E/W/I in
>> that case without any additional text (meaning probably text of just
>> ). It would look a little weird, but it would be consistent and
>> allow you to use the current layout.
>>
>> However, [4] is in some sense more "accurate" since the severity is a
>> property of the tag and not of the extra information.
>
> Right. I also think it is more accurate - and leaving the E/W/I without
> the extra info looks really weird. So welcome v12[1][2][3].
>
> 1. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v12/index.html
> 2. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v12/full/unsorted.html
> 3. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v12/lintian.d.o_v12.patch
This patch has now been applied. Thank you so much for this! I'm sorry
it took me so long to get it integrated. It will be in the next release
and on lintian.d.o shortly thereafter.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: