Your message dated Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:05:12 +0200 with message-id <20080607010512.GO3399@evy.ikibiki.org> and subject line Re: Bug#483678: Please detect NMU of orphaned packages. has caused the Debian Bug report #483678, regarding lintian: Please detect NMU of orphaned packages. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 483678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483678 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: lintian: Please detect NMU of orphaned packages.
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:28:40 +0200
- Message-id: <20080530122840.30970.26283.reportbug@evy.ikibiki.org>
Package: lintian Version: 1.23.49 Severity: wishlist Hi, I've just noticed an NMU of an orphaned package, and I think it'd be great if lintian would warn in this case, suggesting the NMUer to do a QA upload instead. A check on the Maintainer: should be sufficient to get it right, I guess. Mraw, KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Cc: 483678-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#483678: Please detect NMU of orphaned packages.
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:05:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20080607010512.GO3399@evy.ikibiki.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zlpym5kd.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- References: <20080530122840.30970.26283.reportbug@evy.ikibiki.org> <[🔎] 87zlpym5kd.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
On 07/06/2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm fairly sure that Lintian already does; at least, there's code in > Lintian that tries to do this and issue the tag > qa-upload-has-incorrect-version-number. Indeed, and thinking back about it, I think I also noticed it myself some time ago. > If this isn't working, could you point me at a package that gets this > wrong? Looks like I shouldn't have trusted this maintainer to have checked lintian before uploading, nor thought that he would have warned me that he didn't run lintian when I asked him whether I should report this wishlist bug. Sorry for the noise. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: pgpMapo8mzcEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---