Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at> writes: > Hmm, too bad - so I guess throwing in the information that armel is a > standard arch these days is pointless? In case you decide otherwise I > thought about adding the informations in here. I'll certainly make that change for armel if we don't just drop the I: tag completely for the next release. -- Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>