lintian: r1103 - in trunk: checks debian
Author: rra
Date: 2008-01-04 04:47:22 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 1103
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/binaries:
+ [RA] Some packages include debugging symbols in the main package, so
don't warn about unstripped binaries in ../lib/debug as well.
Modified: trunk/checks/binaries
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/binaries 2008-01-03 07:59:16 UTC (rev 1102)
+++ trunk/checks/binaries 2008-01-04 03:47:22 UTC (rev 1103)
@@ -190,15 +190,15 @@
# stripped?
if ($info =~ m,not stripped\s*$,o) {
# Is it an object file (which generally can not be stripped),
- # a kernel module, or perhaps a debugging package?
+ # a kernel module, debugging symbols, or perhaps a debugging package?
# Ocaml executables are exempted, see #252695
unless ($file =~ m,\.k?o$, or $pkg =~ m/-dbg$/ or $pkg =~ m/debug/
- or exists $OCAML{$file}) {
+ or $file =~ m,/lib/debug/, or exists $OCAML{$file}) {
tag "unstripped-binary-or-object", "$file";
}
} else {
# stripped but a debug or profiling library?
- if (($file =~ m,lib/debug/,o) or ($file =~ m,lib/profile/,o)) {
+ if (($file =~ m,/lib/debug/,o) or ($file =~ m,/lib/profile/,o)) {
tag "library-in-debug-or-profile-should-not-be-stripped", "$file";
} else {
# appropriately stripped, but is it stripped enough?
@@ -298,4 +298,8 @@
1;
+# Local Variables:
+# indent-tabs-mode: t
+# cperl-indent-level: 4
+# End:
# vim: syntax=perl ts=8 sw=4
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2008-01-03 07:59:16 UTC (rev 1102)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog 2008-01-04 03:47:22 UTC (rev 1103)
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
lintian (1.23.42) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ * checks/binaries:
+ + [RA] Some packages include debugging symbols in the main package, so
+ don't warn about unstripped binaries in ../lib/debug as well.
* checks/changelog-file{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Don't spell-check lines that include the word "spelling".
Thanks, Andreas Hoenen. (Closes: #456515)
Reply to: