lintian: r889 - in trunk: checks debian

[rra@debian.org]

Author: rra
Date: 2007-05-19 07:27:54 +0200 (Sat, 19 May 2007)
New Revision: 889

Modified:
   trunk/checks/menu-format.desc
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/menu-format.desc:
  + [RA] Improve the pkg-not-in-package-test long description and add a
    manual reference.  (Closes: #423519)

Modified: trunk/checks/menu-format.desc
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/menu-format.desc	2007-05-19 05:17:11 UTC (rev 888)
+++ trunk/checks/menu-format.desc	2007-05-19 05:27:54 UTC (rev 889)
@@ -33,10 +33,17 @@
 
 Tag: pkg-not-in-package-test
 Type: warning
-Info: The menu item doesn't tests to see if the package that contains it
- is installed. This is probably an error. Perhaps it is spelled
- or capitalized wrong, or perhaps the menu file was copied from some other
- package and this was accidentally not changed.
+Info: This menu item doesn't test to see if the package containing it is
+ installed.  The start of any menu item is a conditional testing whether
+ the required packages are installed.  Normally this conditional should
+ always check at least the package containing it, since menu items should
+ be included in the package that provides the application the menu refers
+ to.
+ .
+ This error usually indicates a misspelling of the package name in the
+ menu entry or a copied menu entry from another package that doesn't apply
+ to this one.
+Ref: menu manual 3.2
 
 Tag: duplicated-tag-in-menu-item
 Type: warning

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2007-05-19 05:17:11 UTC (rev 888)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2007-05-19 05:27:54 UTC (rev 889)
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
   * checks/manpages:
     + [RA] Avoid false positives on binaries with X11 in the name.  Patch
       from Kevin B. McCarty.  (Closes: #423229)
+  * checks/menu-format.desc:
+    + [RA] Improve the pkg-not-in-package-test long description and add a
+      manual reference.  (Closes: #423519)
   * checks/menus:
     + [RA] Allow multiple blank lines between doc-base sections and
       trailing blank lines in the file.  fine with this.  Reported by Luis