[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#456405: lintian: Typo in stronger-dependency-implies-weaker Info



Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

T%he phrase "[...] Recommends as well as Recommends." in the Info field of
the stronger-dependency-implies-weaker check sounds strange.  I think that
the patch attached below fixes this.

Rafael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils              2.18~cvs20070812-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  diffstat              1.43-2             produces graph of changes introduc
ii  dpkg-dev              1.13.25            package building tools for Debian
ii  file                  4.17-5etch1        Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gettext               0.16.1-1           GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  intltool-debian       0.35.0+20060710.1  Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii  libparse-debianchange 1.0-1              parse Debian changelogs and output
ii  man-db                2.4.3-6            The on-line manual pager
ii  perl [libdigest-md5-p 5.8.8-7            Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

lintian recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- control-file.desc-orig	2007-12-15 11:51:45.000000000 +0100
+++ control-file.desc	2007-12-15 11:51:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
  weaker dependency field.  In other words, the Depends field of the
  package requires that one of the packages listed in Recommends or
  Suggests be installed, or a package is listed in Recommends as well as
- Recommends.  Current versions of dpkg-gencontrol will silently fix this
+ Suggests.  Current versions of dpkg-gencontrol will silently fix this
  problem by removing the weaker dependency, but it may indicate a more
  subtle bug (misspelling or forgetting to remove the stronger dependency
  when it was moved to the weaker field).

Reply to: