[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian versus Closes in changelog headers



Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> writes:

> For a brief period of time, the way to close a bug on package upload was
> to add a "closes" header to the changelog entry, e.g.:

>     nqc (2.0.2-2) unstable; closes=50669; urgency=low

>       * New upstream documentation.  Fixes Bug#50669.  Thanks to Jim Studt
>         <jim@federated.com> for reporting this.

>      -- Ben Pfaff <blp@gnu.org>  Sat, 20 Nov 1999 01:11:32 -0500

> Modern lintian complains about this, with
> syntax-error-in-debian-changelog "unknown key-value key Closes - copying
> to XS-Closes".  I'm not eager to "change history" by deleting the closes
> keyword or by changing the entry to use the newer "Closes: #xyz" syntax,
> although I certainly could do so.  Could lintian be changed to accept
> this keyword?  Perhaps it could just accept it for changelog entries
> before some date.

Could you report this as a bug against libparse-debianchangelog-perl?
That's the package that does the syntax checking of the changelog file
rather than lintian itself.

Thanks!

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Reply to: