[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r664 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: rra
Date: 2006-05-07 07:40:47 +0200 (Sun, 07 May 2006)
New Revision: 664

Modified:
   trunk/checks/fields
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
  + [RA] Allow perl in Build-Depends if invoked in clean rules.
  + [RA] Allow patch in Build-Depends if yada unpatch is invoked in
    clean rules.

Modified: trunk/checks/fields
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/fields	2006-05-07 05:33:43 UTC (rev 663)
+++ trunk/checks/fields	2006-05-07 05:40:47 UTC (rev 664)
@@ -75,8 +75,10 @@
 my @rule_clean_depends = (
 	[ debhelper => '^\t\s*dh_.+' ],
 	[ dpatch => '^\t\s*dpatch\s' ],
+	[ patch => '^\t\s*(?:perl debian/)?yada\s+unpatch' ],
+	[ perl => '^\t\s*perl\s' ],
 	[ $python_depend => '^\t\s*python\s' ],
-	[ yada => '^\t\s*yada\s' ]
+	[ yada => '^\t\s*yada\s' ],
 );
 
 sub run {

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2006-05-07 05:33:43 UTC (rev 663)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2006-05-07 05:40:47 UTC (rev 664)
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
     + [RA] Since some packages should be in Build-Depends and some should
       be in Build-Depends-Indep, report all of the misplaced ones rather
       than just the first one.  That way, users know which to move.
+    + [RA] Allow perl in Build-Depends if invoked in clean rules.
+    + [RA] Allow patch in Build-Depends if yada unpatch is invoked in
+      clean rules.
   * checks/files{.desc,}:
     + [RA] Add an explicit check for non-world-readable executables to
       provide a more detailed explanation and tighten the accepted
@@ -57,7 +60,7 @@
     + [RA] Update standards version to 3.7.2 (no changes required).
     + [RA] Update description to note calibration for Policy 3.7.2.
 
- -- Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>  Sat,  6 May 2006 22:33:30 -0700
+ -- Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>  Sat,  6 May 2006 22:40:27 -0700
 
 lintian (1.23.19) unstable; urgency=low
 



Reply to: