Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:51:40 -0700 with message-id <87u08c3gtf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> and subject line lintian: no-shlibs-control-file should ignore /lib/libnss_* has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: lintian: no-shlibs-control-file should ignore /lib/libnss_*
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:14:47 +0000
- Message-id: <20031121131447.GA8617@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Package: lintian E: lookupd: no-shlibs-control-file lib/libnss_lookupd-0.1.0.so That's bogus, /lib/libnss_* aren't shared libraries (they're NSS modules). It's pretty silly that glibc insists these are placed directly in /lib, but we're stuck with it; lintian should ignore them where appropriate. This also applies to at least sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 221982-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: lintian: no-shlibs-control-file should ignore /lib/libnss_*
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:51:40 -0700
- Message-id: <87u08c3gtf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes: > E: lookupd: no-shlibs-control-file lib/libnss_lookupd-0.1.0.so > > That's bogus, /lib/libnss_* aren't shared libraries (they're NSS > modules). It's pretty silly that glibc insists these are placed > directly in /lib, but we're stuck with it; lintian should ignore them > where appropriate. > > This also applies to at least > sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib. At some point, these libraries all seem to have acquired SONAMEs and shlibs entries, which seems to indicate that lintian should not worry about making an exception for them. Closing this bug. -- Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---