[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r792 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: rra
Date: 2006-11-22 20:15:10 +0100 (Wed, 22 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 792

Modified:
   trunk/checks/infofiles
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/infofiles:
  + [RA] Don't consider /usr/share/infon to be an info directory.
    Reported by Joachim Breitner.  (Closes: #399857)

Modified: trunk/checks/infofiles
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/infofiles	2006-11-21 02:17:18 UTC (rev 791)
+++ trunk/checks/infofiles	2006-11-22 19:15:10 UTC (rev 792)
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
     my ($fname, $path, $suffix) = fileparse($file);
 
     next unless ($perm =~ m,^[\-l],o)
-	    and ($path =~ m,^usr/share/info, or $path =~ m,^usr/info,);
+	    and ($path =~ m,^usr/share/info/, or $path =~ m,^usr/info/,);
 
     my @fname_pieces = split /\./, $fname;
     my $ext = pop @fname_pieces;

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2006-11-21 02:17:18 UTC (rev 791)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2006-11-22 19:15:10 UTC (rev 792)
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
       than failing with a note that binutils-multiarch is required.  Some
       packages have had ELF binaries recognized by file but unreadable.
       Reported by Bill Allombert.  (Closes: #399456)
+  * checks/infofiles:
+    + [RA] Don't consider /usr/share/infon to be an info directory.
+      Reported by Joachim Breitner.  (Closes: #399857)
   * checks/shared-libs:
     + [RA] Don't report shlib-with-non-pic-code unless we're sure that
       we're looking at a shared library.  Otherwise, we get many false
@@ -21,7 +24,7 @@
       rather than aborting; some packages contain apparently corrupt ELF
       binaries.
 
- -- Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>  Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:53:25 -0800
+ -- Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>  Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:14:50 -0800
 
 lintian (1.23.26) unstable; urgency=low
 



Reply to: