[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r500 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: djpig
Date: 2005-09-22 00:19:47 +0200 (Thu, 22 Sep 2005)
New Revision: 500

Modified:
   trunk/checks/infofiles
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Don't issue install-info-not-called-with-section-option if
the call in postinst is really a removal. Experienced by Ben Pfaff
in autoconf (Closes: #329170)


Modified: trunk/checks/infofiles
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/infofiles	2005-09-21 22:05:40 UTC (rev 499)
+++ trunk/checks/infofiles	2005-09-21 22:19:47 UTC (rev 500)
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@
     tag "install-info-not-called-with-quiet-option", ""
 	unless $postinst{'calls-install-info-quiet'};
     tag "install-info-not-called-with-section-option", ""
-	unless $postinst{'calls-install-info-section'};
+	unless ( $postinst{'calls-install-info-section'}
+		 || $postinst{'calls-install-info-remove'} ) ;
 }
 if ($prerm{'calls-install-info'}) {
     # it must use the --quiet option
@@ -175,6 +176,8 @@
 		    $pres->{'calls-install-info-quiet'} = 1;
 		} elsif ($piece eq '--section') {
 		    $pres->{'calls-install-info-section'} = 1;
+		} elsif ($piece eq '--remove') {
+		    $pres->{'calls-install-info-remove'} = 1;
 		}
 	    }
 	}

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2005-09-21 22:05:40 UTC (rev 499)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2005-09-21 22:19:47 UTC (rev 500)
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
     + [FL] Don't complain about lib(32|64) as unusual directories. Noted
       by Matthias Klose (partly fixes #328612, see checks/shared-libs for
       the rest)
+  * checks/infofiles:
+    + [FL] Don't issue install-info-not-called-with-section-option if
+      the call in postinst is really a removal. Experienced by Ben Pfaff
+      in autoconf (Closes: #329170)
   * checks/scripts:
     + [FL] PythonX.Y dependency can also be satisfied with pythonX.Y-minimal.
       Noted by Matthias Klose (Closes: #326643)



Reply to: