Bug#328614: marked as done (lintian should not complain about read-only ada files)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:27 +0200
with message-id <17196.17991.907145.764629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#328614: lintian should not complain about read-only ada files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 11:22:38 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Sep 16 04:22:38 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGEIf-0003UK-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 04:22:38 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18199
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:36 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2734FD4D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:35 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 17043-37 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:35 +0200 (MEST) 13966
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:35 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j8GBMZ75024751;
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[🔎] 17194.43771.426583.719865@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:35 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org
Subject: lintian should not complain about read-only ada files
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.12
bad-permissions-for-ali-file
AFAIK, these have to be read-only. CCing Ludovic.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328614-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 16:37:32 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Sep 17 09:37:32 2005
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGfgy-0004J9-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:37:32 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24872;
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8E3F20F;
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 00782-41; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:28 +0200 (MEST) 11347
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j8HGbRrt022566;
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:27 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17196.17991.907145.764629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:37:27 +0200
To: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Cc: 328614-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#328614: lintian should not complain about read-only ada files
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050917152655.GC28263@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 17194.43771.426583.719865@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
<[🔎] 20050917152655.GC28263@djpig.de>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: 328614-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: lintian
> > Version: 1.23.12
> >
> > bad-permissions-for-ali-file
> >
> > AFAIK, these have to be read-only. CCing Ludovic.
>
> Yes, and we check for exactly that:
> # ---------------- .ali files (Ada Library Information)
> if ($file =~ m,^usr/lib/.*\.ali$, && $operm != 0444) {
> tag "bad-permissions-for-ali-file", "$file";
> }
>
> So which package was the problem with and which permisions do the
> files have?
no, the package was wrong. my mistake.
Reply to: