Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> writes:
>> So to conclude, there's no reason for that mass bug filing
>> apart from your "feeling" that it "looks funny". Since it poses
>> no real problem at all, I don't even see a lintian-test being
>> warranted for this. This should indeed be closed unless you can
>> come up with some real reason why this should be changed.
> Is this bug worthy of adding to the lintian or linda tests?
lintian already checks for the Origin field in debian/control files. See
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tredundant-origin-field.html for a
list of affected packages.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
pgpAtsKH0cu1o.pgp
Description: PGP signature