[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

lintian: r352 - in trunk: checks debian



Author: jeroen
Date: 2004-10-13 01:57:52 +0200 (Wed, 13 Oct 2004)
New Revision: 352

Modified:
   trunk/checks/nmu.desc
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
checks/nmu.desc:
+ [JvW] Note in source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number's description that
  the mistake could also be the other way around (Closes: #258604)


Modified: trunk/checks/nmu.desc
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/nmu.desc	2004-10-12 23:51:42 UTC (rev 351)
+++ trunk/checks/nmu.desc	2004-10-12 23:57:52 UTC (rev 352)
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
 Info: A source NMU should have a Debian revision of '-x.x'. This is to prevent
  stealing version numbers from the maintainer (and the -x.x.x version numbers
  are reserved for binary-only NMU's).
+ .
+ Maybe you didn't intend this upload to be a NMU, in that case, please
+ doublecheck the used emailaddress and maintainer, the most recent entry in
+ the changelog should be byte-for-byte identical to a maintainer or one of the
+ uploaders.
 
 Tag: maintainer-upload-has-incorrect-version-number
 Type: warning

Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog	2004-10-12 23:51:42 UTC (rev 351)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog	2004-10-12 23:57:52 UTC (rev 352)
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
       to be consistent with policy, which says a manpage should be available
       (and doesn't use "must" for it). Thanks to Robert Millan for his patch
       (Closes: #271014)
+  * checks/nmu.desc:
+    + [JvW] Note in source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number's description that
+      the mistake could also be the other way around (Closes: #258604)
   * checks/po-debconf:
     + [JvW] Don't give missing-file-from-potfile-in on empty lines
       (Thanks Adam Conrad for noticing)



Reply to: