Processed: Retitling
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 233116 [checks/debconf] lintian: check that templates are separated by an empty line
Bug#233116: [checks/debconf] lintian: check that templates are separated by an empty line
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 242345 [checks/po-debconf] po-debconf: check for outdated templates.pot files
Bug#242345: [checks/po-debconf] po-debconf: check for outdated templates.pot files
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 234531 [checks/fields] lintian: Check for (build-)dep on xlibs(-dev)
Bug#234531: [checks/fields] lintian: Check for (build-)dep on xlibs(-dev)
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 242484 [checks/fields] Please resurrect build-depends-without-arch-dep
Bug#242484: [checks/fields] Please resurrect build-depends-without-arch-dep
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 235356 [checks/fields] check common Depends and Recommends
Bug#235356: [checks/fields] check common Depends and Recommends
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 234978 [checks/fields] Check for common Depends and Recommends
Bug#234978: [checks/fields] Check for common Depends and Recommends
Changed Bug title.
> tags 234978 + pending
Bug#234978: [checks/fields] Check for common Depends and Recommends
Tags were: pending
Bug#235356: [checks/fields] check common Depends and Recommends
Tags added: pending
> retitle 236534 [checks/binaries] sparc64 binaries in the sparc port
Bug#236534: [checks/binaries] sparc64 binaries in the sparc port
Changed Bug title.
> #We only check the dependency syntax, not semantics:
> tag 205935 + wontifx
Unknown tag/s: wontifx.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n.
Bug#205935: lintian: Should check for contrib and non-free dependencies of main package
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: