Re: Lintian: 1.22.11 RC2 available
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:44:53AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:03:12PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Colin, can you check this out, and then upload? My deb-line has ~rc2
> > appended to the version, so that must be removed and of course a
> > re-debuild then.
>
> OK, sorry for the delay here.
>
> I spotted a few errors:
>
> * You updated the list of valid archive sections, but it still seems
> to be missing at least kde and libdevel. I didn't check for other
> omissions.
indeed, fixed it in trunk/
> * $MINOR and $PATCH in checks/standards-version need to be updated.
> Since this is trivial, I've just done this.
included in 1.22.11 branch
> * There's also another failure, which also appears benign and seems to
> be due to a change in dpkg (from what I can tell, dpkg-gencontrol
> has got more intelligent and is getting rid of the newline in
> Conflicts in the test's debian/control file):
>
> Running lintian -I on debian/tests/relations_4*.changes...
> FAILED:
> --- testset/tags.relations 2004-02-08 21:52:49.000000000 +0000
> +++ debian/tests/tags.relations 2004-02-23 00:33:34.171850616 +0000
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> E: relations: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version dpkg
> W: relations: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends mail-transport-agent
> E: relations: needlessly-depends-on-awk
> -E: relations: multiline-field conflicts
> W: relations: bad-version-in-relation conflicts: foobar (<< 5&5)
> W: relations: package-relation-with-self replaces: relations
> E: relations: obsolete-field optional
jvw and I spotted this already but we hadn't decided yet if we work
around dpkg's new cleverness or just remove the test.
> I've uploaded 1.22.11 with the following diff against 1.22.11~rc2:
Cool. 1.22.12 should be ready soon ;)
And when I get the udeb support fully working we have to think
about 1.23.0.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: