[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#248018: marked as done (lintian: doesn't detect missing debconf dependencies)



Your message dated Sun, 9 May 2004 08:41:16 +0200
with message-id <20040509064116.GA26121@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de>
and subject line Bug#248018: lintian: doesn't detect missing debconf dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2004 16:43:35 +0000
>From mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de Sat May 08 09:43:34 2004
Return-path: <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) [212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMUvG-0000rN-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 09:43:34 -0700
Received: from darren.int.ka0.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.33]:33179)
	by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.33 (Debian package 4.33-0+1zg1))
	id 1BMUvF-0005O5-3U; Sat, 08 May 2004 18:43:33 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: lintian: doesn't detect missing debconf dependencies
Bcc: Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 16:43:32 +0000
Message-ID: <[🔎] E1BMUvF-0005O5-3U@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.0
Severity: normal

Hi,

the lintian 1.22.9 currently in use on lintian.debian.org correctly
complains about a missing debconf dependency on console-log 1.0-7.
Current lintian doesn't detect that error any more.

Greetings
Marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-darren
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                   2.14.90.0.7-6 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  diffstat                   1.34-1        produces graph of changes introduc
ii  file                       4.07-2        Determines file type using "magic"
ii  man-db                     2.4.2-15      The on-line manual pager
ii  perl                       5.8.4-1       Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 06:41:21 +0000
>From mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de Sat May 08 23:41:21 2004
Return-path: <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) [212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BMi00-0002hb-00; Sat, 08 May 2004 23:41:21 -0700
Received: from mh by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.33 (Debian package 4.33-0+1zg1))
	id 1BMhzw-0006nW-NF; Sun, 09 May 2004 08:41:16 +0200
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 08:41:16 +0200
From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
Cc: 248018-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#248018: lintian: doesn't detect missing debconf dependencies
Message-ID: <20040509064116.GA26121@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de>
References: <[🔎] E1BMUvF-0005O5-3U@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> <[🔎] 20040509011443.GD2254@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040509011443.GD2254@djpig.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 248018-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 03:14:43AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Or am I getting something wrong?

No, you are not. I didn't see that the debconf dependency is pulled in
by the misc:Depends clause that is in the package. Closing the bug.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29



Reply to: