Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org> writes: [checks/fields] > I've rewritten the thing (more or less) from scratch, but only had time > for a few checks (meaning "everything seems to work as it should with > two really broken packages"). I just had a few minutes to test it on my own packages, which lead to fixes for several rather annoying false positives. Marc -- $_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3* )e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus'; s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
fields
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
pgpoSU8k8T7Xs.pgp
Description: PGP signature