Re: Section gnustep, was: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:57:46AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> >> I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just like we have one
> >> for gnome and kde.
> > I think this is a good idea. Would it start by being populated with
> > anything depending on gnustep*, or did I not think that through? What
> > packages would that give?
> Yep, this would also help me have less warnings in the gnustep-meta
> packages ( http://www.linuks.mine.nu/i_debian/meta-gnustep/ ), can we
> change lintian like this:
>
> If all agree that we add 'gnustep' to the section. I think
> lintian package should be updated by adding 'gnustep' to:
> lintian source
> testset/info_tags.non-us, line 28
> checks/common_data.pm, line 21
> checks/fields.desc, line 172
This should not be done until the section is added to the archive by the
ftpmasters. If and when that happens, lintian will follow.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: