lintian: r96 - trunk/testset
Author: djpig
Date: 2004-03-08 00:11:00 +0100 (Mon, 08 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 96
Modified:
trunk/testset/info_tags.relations
trunk/testset/tags.relations
Log:
Remove multiline-field from tags file, since dpkg apparently got smarter
Update info_tags.relations to new policy references
Modified: trunk/testset/info_tags.relations
===================================================================
--- trunk/testset/info_tags.relations 2004-03-06 00:00:46 UTC (rev 95)
+++ trunk/testset/info_tags.relations 2004-03-07 23:11:00 UTC (rev 96)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
N: Each binary package has to include a plain file
N: /usr/share/doc/<pkg>/copyright
N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 13.5 for details.
+N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.5 for details.
N:
W: relations-multiple-libs: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly
N:
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
N: Note also that the synopsis is not part of the rest of the
N: "Description:" field.
N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 5.7.1 for details.
+N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.4.1 for details.
N:
E: relations-multiple-libs: description-synopsis-is-duplicated
N:
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
N: formed or that the extended description has been wrongly copied and
N: pasted.
N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 5.7.1 for details.
+N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.4.2 for details.
N:
E: relations-multiple-libs: package-depends-on-multiple-libstdc-versions libstdc++2.10 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 libstdc++3.0
N:
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@
N: useful, except in the case of a package Conflicting with itself, if
N: its package name doubles as a virtual package.
N:
-W: relations: package-relation-with-self depends: relations(<< 3)
-E: relations: package-has-a-duplicate-relation relations, relations(<< 3)
+W: relations: package-relation-with-self depends: relations (<< 3)
+E: relations: package-has-a-duplicate-relation relations, relations (<< 3)
N:
N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package which is
N: already implied by other relations it declares, and is therefore
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
N: depend on essential packages but if it must do so, the depends should
N: have a version string.
N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 2.3.4 for details.
+N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.5 for details.
N:
W: relations: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends mail-transport-agent
N:
@@ -111,23 +111,17 @@
N: anyway, as dpkg doesn't support versioned provides), you should remove
N: the dependency on awk.
N:
-E: relations: multiline-field conflicts
-N:
-N: Most control fields must have only a single line of data.
-N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.1 for details.
-N:
W: relations: bad-version-in-relation conflicts: foobar (<< 5&5)
N:
N: The version number used in this relationship does not match the
N: defined format of a version number.
N:
-N: Refer to Policy Manual, chapter 4 for details.
+N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 5.6.11 for details.
N:
W: relations: package-relation-with-self replaces: relations
E: relations: obsolete-field optional
N:
N: This is one of the fields listed in Policy Manual as obsolete.
N:
-N: Refer to policy D.2.24 for details.
+N: Refer to policy D.2.6 for details.
N:
Modified: trunk/testset/tags.relations
===================================================================
--- trunk/testset/tags.relations 2004-03-06 00:00:46 UTC (rev 95)
+++ trunk/testset/tags.relations 2004-03-07 23:11:00 UTC (rev 96)
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
E: relations: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version dpkg
W: relations: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends mail-transport-agent
E: relations: needlessly-depends-on-awk
-E: relations: multiline-field conflicts
W: relations: bad-version-in-relation conflicts: foobar (<< 5&5)
W: relations: package-relation-with-self replaces: relations
E: relations: obsolete-field optional
Reply to: