[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235735: lintian: CVS / .cvsignore terminology could be better

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:57:17AM -0600, Christopher L Cheney wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.22.11
> Severity: minor
> The terminology used for saying that a CVS or .cvsignore file is
> included could be better. Specifically:
> It may have been installed by accident.
> It may have been included by accident.
> And since cvs export doesn't even get rid of .cvsignore files the amount
> of them in the archive is probably pretty high. Anyone using cvs and not
> using something like autotools "make dist" to produce tarballs likely
> will have them in source.

Any suggestions? Especially about the terminology?


Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)

Reply to: